Monthly Archives: August 2012

Apple has won its claim in the USA that Samsung have infringed its Patents. The jury believed the Apple case was more compelling than Samsung’s counter-claim. This could potentially cost Samsung dearly. The fine imposed is $1.05bn.  Apple originally sought compensation of $2.5bn. Samsung is likely to appeal against the decision and may ask for […]

There have been a number of occasions when we have established contact with solicitor’s practises to consider awarding a contract to represent a client’s interest in a commercial matter. One of the early questions we are asked is, ‘Who is the client and what is the issue?’ This is followed by a request for details […]

Will this be an Apple Turnover? As we discussed recently, in the UK courts Samsung’s position was vindicated – it did not infringe Apple’s Patent. To be precise, on 9th July 2012 the High Court of Justice of England and Wales ruled that Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited’s Galaxy Tablet computers, namely the Galaxy Tab 10.1, […]

Strategic inventory The Just In Time principle is fine when it is appropriate to the specific requirements of the buying organisation. Who determines the strategic inventory strategy? Brian Farrington Limited has worked with an international manufacturing company who decided that the suppliers would carry the burden of strategic inventory. Our client insisted that the suppliers […]

We are all in it together! It is a comfort that whistle-blowers are helpful in exposing mismanagement of risk. Sadly, in some cases the whistle-blower’s efforts are unwelcome; see the recent Wirral Council situation. (See press report here) Our research has found Report No. 1004706 from the Washington State Auditor’s Office Washington State Parts and Recreation […]

ALL CHANGE! Today’s risk is not about Virgin Trains losing the West Coast Franchise. It is about the resistance buyers get when they suggest using a new supplier. How many ‘reasons’ can you think of to block such a change? Here are some we have encountered: –          Their quality won’t be any good –          They […]

  Architects of their own demise. In a recent case (European Commission V Federal Republic of Germany), Germany was found to have infringed the European Procurement Directives. When I say Germany, I don’t mean the entire population but the actions of the municipality of Niedernhausen has caused the State to be in the dock. In […]